This photo challenge is all about the details! Or more particularly, being close to the subject and fill the frame with it. What I am talking about here is close up photography.
A couple of years ago when I first got interested in close up (and macro) photography, I always use the largest aperture possible to get the shallowest depth of field (because of the blurry backgrounds). That resulted in only a part of my subject being sharp - which was very frustrating. In this challenge I have forced myself to use smaller apertures, to get a longer depth of field and get my subject all sharp. But the aperture cannot be too small. I still want the blurry background!
Note: Close up should not be confused with macro. Close up is basically when you take a photo of (e.g) a butterfly and macro is when you take a photo the butterfly’s eye. See the differences? In close up, you capture your subject as a whole and with macro you capture only a small part of that subject.. But let’s not start a fight about this! Photography is photography, we don’t really need labels.
This is a response to the post “Photo challenge: close up” by Daily post
Small vs. lagre aperture!
Just to show you the impact of using a smaller aperture when shooting close up (in comparison of using a larger aperture), I have provide you with the two photos above.
The first one is taken with f/2.8 and the other with f/7.1. As we can see, the second image has a smoother transition between the sharp and unsharp parts in the image. I personally prefer the second one for this specific case, but this is of course a matter of taste. I am not saying one is better than the other, I just wanted to show you the differences!
Hope you enjoyed this because I certainly did. More photo challenges will come up!